11/20/06

Vol 1, Issue 7: Creating Music with Mass Appeal

I’m sure by the very title of this piece that some of you are rolling your eyes at the concept of me providing you with guidelines about how to write sellable music. I will give you this: there is no one-to-ten detailed instructional manual outlining how to write the perfect song.

For that matter, I feel that songwriting is an art form requiring a great deal of skill that cannot be mastered by everyone. However, songs that have been able to cross generations, cultures, and time barriers do share some commonalities, which I don’t believe is mere coincidence.

The tunes that make an impact and continue to maintain their popularity 20 years later are memorable for more than just their catchy melodies. The songs to which I’m referring have been repeatedly listed in the Top 100 lists year after year. Though these songs are dissimilar in genre and methodology, what makes each and every one of them able to claim “greatness” is this: simply put, they are extremely well-written, and therefore have mass appeal.

For starters, the lyrical content of said songs tends to prey on social and/or political mentalities/issues that drive a solid point home with the listener. But, the message of each of these songs is presented in such a fashion that it is accessible to even the status quo. Nothing too complicated. Nothing too convoluted.

When John Lennon asked us to “Imagine” a world without violence, poverty, hunger, and religion, he painted a crystal clear picture. He blatantly probed listeners to question their existence, and rethink the structure of society. He ended on a hopeful note stating that he knows others like himself are out there, and he looks forward to the day in which everyone in the world, despite their differences, will learn to “live as one.” The purpose of his song is self-evident: to make listeners question that which is presented to them, rather than just accepting things as they are.

Another strategy of writing strong lyrics is delving into concepts that are relatable on a personal level. Everyone has had a point in their life in which they’ve felt like Mick Jagger: unable to get any “Satisfaction.” Though Jagger was referring to satisfaction in the sexual sense, a listener does not have to interpret the song in that manner because the lyrics remain open-ended enough to suggest otherwise.

Audiences appreciate the opportunity to take a song and apply it to their personal situation. As a consequence, most often songs that encompass complex metaphors don’t become hit singles, because audiences can’t get a grasp of what the songwriter is trying to say.

I’ve found that the best songs out there cover issues that are common and easy to understand. Hence, the reasons as to why we have so many popular cliché love songs. Everyone experiences love, romance, bad breakups, and broken hearts (hopefully not always in that order).

Next, comes the melody.

Writing a song that gets stuck in a listener’s head may seem like an easy task, however you want your melody to be unforgettable because it’s well structured, not because it’s extremely annoying.

I can count several instances in which I’ve had Britney Spears’(sorry to pick on her again, but it’s just so easy) songs stuck in my head on repeat, but it’s not as though it was an enjoyable experience. No one likes a broken record. Although Spears’ songwriters manage to write her material that is “catchy,” it’s not always catchy in a good way. There is a difference between good and bad catchy.

Good catchiness makes a listener want to sing along with the track after hearing only a few short moments, and without knowledge of the majority of the lyrics. Good catchiness also tends to stimulate movement; whether it be head bobbing, toe tapping, air guitaring, or drumming on the nearest object. These are the songs that you listen to loud and proud while cruising down the highway with all the windows open; songs such as ACDC’s “Back in Black” or Queen’s “We Will Rock You.” They are more than just an auditory experience.

And by melody, I’m not just referring to the vocal line. All of the instruments play a crucial part in writing a well-structured song. A great singer needs a strong band to back him/her, just as a talented musical act needs a charismatic vocalist to front them. Therefore, dynamics are of the utmost importance. A band needs to know when to go all out, and when to draw back depending upon what the lyrics suggest. Different dynamics constitute different emotional reactions. Thus, the instrumentation and the lyrics need to be in synch with each other in order to maximize the impact of your message.

Additionally, your songs need to be able to maintain the listener’s attention all the way through. Add solos, riffs, bridges, breakdowns, and highlight each of your instrumentalists’ individual talent. Keep switching it up so that the listener becomes entranced, dying to know what’s coming next. But, be careful not to go overboard with your verses, as above all, your chorus should be the section that sells the song.

When it comes to writing songs with mass appeal, writing a champion chorus is by far the greatest feat, and it definitely takes time to master. Eventually, songwriters are able to develop their own style, but not without years of practice and experimentation. Despite this, understanding the following general principle makes it easier to get a grip on chorus writing.

Using as few words as needed to get the main message across, and repetition of words and phrases will definitely assist in making your chorus a powerful tool. For that matter, some of the best choruses written in history revolve entirely around the repetition of a single phrase such as Alanis Morissette’s, “You Oughta Know.” It’s bold, in-your-face, and straight to the point.

Even if a listener only hears the chorus of this song, the main message Morissette is trying to make is still apparent. Nothing beyond those three simple words really needs to be said. With a single phrase, Morissette managed to write one of the most impactful songs of the 90s, especially for feminists, and one of the best “fuck-you” songs of all time.

The last rule of thumb that I will be discussing in regards to writing strong material doesn’t really come into play, until your group is ready to approach radio stations for airplay and/or record labels for roster consideration.

Few are aware of the fact that the first 30 seconds of a song is the determining factor in terms of whether or not a band gets radio play and/or a record deal. May I repeat, only the first 30 seconds of a given song! You’ll note that this is a very short period of time to grasp a listener’s attention. So, suffice it to say, you better make it good.

If you do manage to present something of interest within that time frame, both station managers and A&R reps will quickly flip through your other tracks to see if it was just a fluke, or if your band has genuine marketability. Therefore, your material must be consistently captivating.

When it comes to creating compositions that have the potential for mass appeal, keeping it simple in all respects predominantly seems to be the key to success. However, I will note that there are always exceptions to these general guidelines, and one can never be certain whether they’ve stumbled upon greatness or failure without testing their material amongst different audiences to gage opinion. By providing these songwriting principles I’m not trying to stifle your creativity, nor am I suggesting that the only songs that are any good are simple. Hell, I like my Deep Purple and The Doors every now and again. All I’m saying is that if you want your band to have commercial success, you'll need to buy into this formula to a certain extent.

Irrespective of this, the tendency these days is to release albums with only two to three strong singles. Therefore, if you’re a prog-rocker at heart, you may just be in luck. There’s definitely a market for what I like to refer to as “stoner rock,” but keep in mind, in order for songs of that nature to attain success, they usually need to break in through an underground movement first, which will obviously pose a greater challenge to your band. In addition, they will more than likely require a radio edit that will substantially cut down your 10-minute guitar solos. Though, I do wish you all the power in the world, if this is the route you choose to undertake.

Rather, if you are simply a musician who creates art for art sake, never let these guidelines constrict your passion. They are merely meant to be used as a tool for bands wishing to obtain commercial success, and with that comes financial remuneration. And…let me tell you, there’s nothing better than getting paid for something you really enjoy doing.


About the Author:

Rose Cora Perry is the frontwoman for Canadian hard rock band ANTI-HERO known as “The 21st Century Answer to Nirvana”, as well as the sole owner and operator of HER Records, a management company in which she offers marketing, promotion, publicity, tour booking, and artist development services.

Her band ANTI-HERO has toured extensively across North America playing notable festivals such as Warped Tour, Canadian Music Week, NorthbyNorthEast, Wakefest, and MEANYFest.

Voted “Best Rock Act of the Year” by numerous industry publications, their critically acclaimed debut album, "Unpretty" is available worldwide for purchase.

Rose Cora Perry is a dedicated promoter of D.I.Y. ethics, and an avid supporter of independent musicians.For more information on Rose Cora Perry and her band's accomplishments, please visit http://www.anti-hero.ca/ or http://www.rosecoraperry.com/

11/13/06

Vol 1, Issue 6: What's in a Name?

Think back for a moment to highschool English class (yes, I know it may be painful for some of you) when you studied Shakespeare’s Romeo & Juliet, and came across the legendary line, “What’s in a name? That which we call a rose by any other word would smell as sweet,” (2.2.1-2.)

Although it’s true that the rose, the object in question, would not physically change if it were to be renamed, the meaning associated with it would be altered. When the term “rose” is mentioned in conversation, various connotations and symbols with which it’s associated come to mind. If this word were to be replaced with another, those meanings could potentially be lost.

Words are more than just letters strung together to create sounds. They evoke emotion and/or action. Therefore, putting serious consideration into your band’s name selection process is essential.

Your band name should be catchy, easy to pronounce, universally understood, but most importantly, it needs to mean something to the band. One of the most frequently asked questions in interviews, is “What is the story behind your band name?” or “What does your band name mean?” If there is no rationale behind the choice of your band name, the media may get the impression that you aren’t taking your music career very seriously. Though there are some bands that chose names for their humour or shock value, I honestly believe that there should be something more to it. Comedic value and controversy will only go so far, and being left to explain a lame story regarding your band’s name selection, year after year, will get old fast.

When it comes to band name selection, looking through a dictionary, or thesaurus can often assist with brainstorming, but be wary of deciding upon something without researching first to see if there’s already an established act that goes by that name. If you want to avoid band name hassles, the Internet can definitely help. Conducting a preliminary search in various band directories is a good starting point.

Keep in mind that there are several bands that share the same or similar names. The only time when this will become an issue is when, for example: Band A from Canada decides to tour Europe where another act named Band A resides.

In such a situation, the Canadian Band A legally would be required to adopt an alias when touring that region, or in extreme cases, may be required to forfeit their rights to their band name altogether if reasonable evidence can prove that the European act was established previously, and holds the registration rights to the band name. I’m sure some of you remember the infamous Bush X incident some years back, in which they were required to drop the “X” out of their name because of this very situation.

Unfortunately there is no such thing as a law that can copyright a name, whether it be the title of a book, a movie heading, or a band name. However, band name registration, the next best thing, is widely available. There are fantastic sites such as http://www.bandname.com/, which allow musicians to register their band name in a worldwide directory for a minimal fee.

As the website notes, “establishing prior usage is a key component in protecting your name and unwelcome legal challenges. The Worldwide Registry notifies artists and labels where potential territorial name conflicts exists and registers your historical claim to ‘name’ usage”. Although sites such as one this exist, unfortunately not every band utilizes them or is even aware of their presence. Irrespective of this, I do recommend registering your band name through some avenue because if you ever find yourself in a legal battle, having a paper trail will definitely add credibility to your argument.

As an extension of your band’s name, “tag-lines” (similar to slogans) are often used in association with promotional purposes. These tag-lines are either derived from notable press quotes or they are a summation of how the band wants to be identified by the public. Short and sweet will really win the ticket here, as well as creativity, but be careful not to go overboard. Do NOT state that your band is the best thing since sliced bread. The premise behind tag-lines is to make your band identifiable: to associate a catch phrase with it, that makes you stick out from the rest.

A common practice is to draw a comparison between your band and a well respected/ renowned act of the past with an added twist. If you are unfamiliar with this practice, I can offer you a personal anecdote. My band Anti-Hero has been tagged “The 21st Century Answer to Nirvana” by CoverZone Magazine, USA. The editor of this magazine made an allusion to Nirvana because she feels that our music speaks to youth culture and their concerns, does not follow suit with the current popular trends or conventions, and is unapologetic in its hard-hitting honesty much like Nirvana was in the early 90s. Whether you agree with this comparison or not is up to your discretion, however, it’s become a great promotional tool for us, and we’ve found more often than not, that fans and reviewers alike feel we live up to the reputation.

Establishing an unforgettable name and solid tag-line is really half the battle to managing your band’s image, so leave something with people that they can remember and tell to all of their friends.


About the Author:

Rose Cora Perry is the frontwoman for Canadian hard rock band ANTI-HERO known as “The 21st Century Answer to Nirvana”, as well as the sole owner and operator of HER Records, a management company in which she offers marketing, promotion, publicity, tour booking, and artist development services.

Her band ANTI-HERO has toured extensively across North America playing notable festivals such as Warped Tour, Canadian Music Week, NorthbyNorthEast, Wakefest, and MEANYFest.

Voted “Best Rock Act of the Year” by numerous industry publications, their critically acclaimed debut album, "Unpretty" is available worldwide for purchase.

Rose Cora Perry is a dedicated promoter of D.I.Y. ethics, and an avid supporter of independent musicians.For more information on Rose Cora Perry and her band's accomplishments, please visit http://www.anti-hero.ca/ or http://www.rosecoraperry.com/

11/6/06

Vol 1, Issue 5: The Importance of Image

As I mentioned last week, it is imperative to understand that a band’s marketing strategies are just as, if not more, important than a band’s musical talent. If you don’t believe me, look at the career of any pop-tart.

Very few pop singers actually write their own material. For that matter, a lot of them can’t even perform their songs live because frankly they can’t pull it off. Their producers should be awarded for their ability to make these untalented acts sound half-decent. But in actuality, so long as the Britney Spears’ of the world maintain nice “t” and “a”, they will remain top selling artists. Why? Well, it’s no secret that sex sells.

By stating this, I don’t want you to misinterpret me and believe that I am suggesting that bands should buy into this mentality: marketing themselves solely based on their physical appeal. Quite the opposite really. I loathe this practice, and feel it is extremely unfair that these perfectly marketed commodities often overshadow artists with genuine talent. However, it must be recognized that the record labels which chose to represent such acts use everything in their power to sell them and it works, regardless of the fact that these are “musicians”, who for the most part, can’t even play instruments.

It’s definitely an oddity that we have models posing as musicians within the artistic world as this kind of pretentious imitation does not occur amongst painters, sculptors, writers, or the like. They are the real thing. DaVinci didn’t have an artist behind him creating his masterpieces while he stood as the undeserving poster-child receiving all the credit. However, it must be taken into consideration that this is not a new trend. For that matter, pawning off relatively musically talent-less acts purely on their sexual attractiveness dates back to as early as the days of Elvis.

Though some may curse me for saying this, “The King of Rock’n’Roll” was the precursor to the Britneys of today. Though he could dance, and sing to a degree, what broke him was his physicality (largely due to the advent of the television). As well, the prevalent racism towards the black artists of the time assisted his career greatly, while leaving true talents, like Chuck Berry, under-recognized for their significant musical contributions.

Did you know, for example, that Elvis NEVER wrote a song throughout his entire career? Thus, how can he be deemed “The King” if he wasn’t even a musician, but rather a cover artist whose material was stolen from and uncredited to the talented African American songwriters of that era?

My rationale for explaining all of this is as follows: I want to make it clear that truly talented bands need to use everything they’ve got in order to stand a chance against these acts. Record labels don’t have a conscience when it comes to marketing: if they can find something that sells regardless of the scandals potentially attached to it, they will utilize it. In the end, the ability to make money trumps everything.

Though I do not promote partaking in immoral or illegal activities when it comes to making a name for your band, I do think that a band’s marketing is not a subject that should be dealt with lightly. Though these aspects are often overlooked or unconsidered, it’s important to realize that a band’s fight for fame begins by defining a meaningful name, strong image, and an identifiable sound.


About the Author:

Rose Cora Perry is the frontwoman for Canadian hard rock band ANTI-HERO known as “The 21st Century Answer to Nirvana”, as well as the sole owner and operator of HER Records, a management company in which she offers marketing, promotion, publicity, tour booking, and artist development services.

Her band ANTI-HERO has toured extensively across North America playing notable festivals such as Warped Tour, Canadian Music Week, NorthbyNorthEast, Wakefest, and MEANYFest.

Voted “Best Rock Act of the Year” by numerous industry publications, their critically acclaimed debut album, "Unpretty" is available worldwide for purchase.

Rose Cora Perry is a dedicated promoter of D.I.Y. ethics, and an avid supporter of independent musicians.
For more information on Rose Cora Perry and her band's accomplishments, please visit http://www.anti-hero.ca/ or http://www.rosecoraperry.com/